Experimental study evaluates seismic performance of two connection types in prefabricated walls, suggesting new design strategies.
This experimental study evaluates the seismic performance of two vertical connection types in a novel precast grid composite wall structure (PGCWS): a steel bar anchorage (SW-1) and a mortar cushion connection (SW-2). Quasi-static cyclic tests were conducted on 1:2-scale specimens to assess failure modes, hysteretic behavior, stiffness degradation, and energy dissipation capacity. The results indicate that SW-1 maintains structural integrity and facilitates controlled damage distribution, demonstrating ductile failure with an ultimate drift of 1/45.5, stable hysteresis loops, and high energy dissipation (20,400 kN mm). In contrast, SW-2 exhibited premature interface slip, resulting in brittle failure characterized by significant hysteresis pinching, rapid stiffness loss, and substantially lower energy dissipation (11,400 kN mm), with a limited ultimate drift of 1/66.5. Based on these findings, performance-based design recommendations are proposed. The steel bar anchorage is advised for mid- to high-rise buildings in high-seismic regions due to its robustness and energy dissipation capability. The mortar cushion connection may be suitable for low- to mid-rise structures where construction efficiency is emphasized, provided that inter-story drift is strictly controlled. This research offers essential experimental evidence to support the practical implementation of PGCWS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: