Comparative analysis reveals CO2 capture efficiency and economic feasibility of two technologies, suggesting optimal strategies.
This study compared the performance and economic feasibility of two carbon capture technologies: Supersonic Separator (SS) and Chemical Absorption (CA) using Methyldiethanolamine (MDEA). Process simulations of natural gas processing plants were utilized through Aspen HYSYS. The resulted demonstrated that in CO2-rich fields, SS achieved a maximum exergy efficiency of 74.01%, due to the absence of solvent regeneration. In contrast, CA demonstrated superior CO2 removal in methane-rich streams, particularly at high pressures (51.34 bar) and flow rates (50 MMSCFD). The economic analysis indicated that CA offered a shorter Payback Period (PBP) and higher internal rate of return, making it suitable for short-term applications, while SS provided greater long-term profitability. The novelty of this work lied in its integrated evaluation of thermodynamic performance and economic viability across diverse gas compositions, providing a decision-making framework for optimizing Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) strategies in the natural gas sector.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dwiyantoro et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: