Analysis of decline in Global Maritime Fulcrum discourse in Indonesia under Joko Widodo, revealing internal political constraints.
This study explores the termination of the Global Maritime Fulcrum (GMF) discourse in President Joko Widodo’s foreign policy. Initially central to his 2014 presidential campaign and early administration, the GMF concept—with its five foundational pillars—was envisioned to transform Indonesia into a maritime-oriented nation, revive its maritime identity, and enhance its role in Indo-Pacific geopolitics. However, as Jokowi’s first term ended, the GMF gradually lost prominence. It was no longer promoted during the 2019 campaign nor prioritized in his second-term foreign policy agenda. Using the frameworks of national role conception, role contestation, and role legitimacy, this paper argues that despite Indonesia's alignment with regional geopolitical dynamics and minimal vertical or systemic contestation, the GMF discourse declined due to Jokowi’s failure to secure horizontal legitimacy among domestic political elites. These internal political constraints ultimately hindered the implementation and legitimacy of the GMF, rendering it irrelevant to Indonesia’s foreign policy during Jokowi’s second term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Putu Shangrina Pramudia (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: