Nonrandomized prospective intervention improved antibiotic choice and timing in surgical patients, suggesting effective policy implementation.
Background: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is a critical measure in preventing surgical site infections. However, inconsistent practices and a lack of adherence to evidence-based guidelines often compromise its effectiveness. This study evaluated the impact of a standardized institutional SAP policy on the appropriateness of antibiotic choice and timing in a tertiary care hospital in South India. Methodology: A nonrandomized prospective interventional study was conducted from September 2023 to August 2024. Surgical patients undergoing elective clean and clean-contaminated procedures were included. A baseline audit ( n = 317) assessed SAP practices across seven surgical departments. A hospital-specific SAP policy was then developed in line with ASHP 2013 and ICMR 2017 guidelines, incorporating input from surgical teams and local antibiogram data. Postintervention audit data ( n = 230) were collected after policy implementation. Compliance in antibiotic selection and timing relative to surgical incision was compared pre- and postintervention using Chi-square analysis. Results: Compliance with appropriate antibiotic choice significantly improved from 68.7% in the preintervention phase to 98.7% postintervention ( P < 0.00001). Similarly, compliance with the appropriate timing of administration increased from 64% to 75.2% ( P = 0.0054). Key barriers identified during baseline included inconsistent antibiotic availability and administration delays due to preoperative dosing in the wards. Policy implementation, real-time audits, and staff sensitization addressed these gaps. Conclusion: The introduction of a standardized institutional SAP policy markedly enhanced adherence to evidence-based practices regarding both antibiotic selection and timing. The results underscore the need for localized policy development, stakeholder consensus, and operational integration to improve SAP compliance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murugesan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: