Retrospective cohort study shows metabolic tumor volume and indices predict survival in DLBCL patients, suggesting improved risk assessment.
Background and Objectives: Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and inflammation-based indices have recently gained attention as potential prognostic markers of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of metabolic and systemic inflammatory parameters in predicting treatment response, relapse, and overall survival (OS) in patients with DLBCL. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 70 patients with DLBCL. Clinical characteristics, laboratory values, and metabolic parameters, including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmaxliver and SUVmax), heterogeneity indices HI1 and HI2, and MTV were analyzed. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests. Receiver operating characteristic analyses helped evaluate the diagnostic performance of the selected biomarkers in predicting relapse and mortality. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the independent predictors. Results: The mean OS and mean relapse-free survival (RFS) were 71.6 ± 7.4 and 38.7 ± 2.9 months, respectively. SUVmaxliver ≤ 22 and HI2 > 62.3 were associated with a significantly shorter OS. High lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels and HI2 > 87.9 were significantly associated with a reduced RFS. LDH, SUVmaxliver, and HI2 had a significant predictive value for relapse. SUVmaxliver and HI2 levels were also predictive of mortality; SUVmaxliver ≤ 22 and HI2 > 62.3 independently predicted mortality, while HI2 > 87.9 independently predicted relapse. MTV was not significantly associated with survival. Conclusions: Metabolic tumor burden and inflammation-based markers, particularly SUVmaxliver and HI2, are significant prognostic indicators of DLBCL and may enhance risk stratification and aid in identifying patients with an increased risk of relapse or mortality, potentially guiding personalized therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solmaz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: