Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Advanced spiral inductor models improve accuracy of inductance and S-parameters in GaN technology, suggesting better designs.
In this paper, the accuracy of basic and advanced spiral inductor models for gallium nitride (GaN) integrated inductors is evaluated. Specifically, the experimental measurements of geometrically scaled circular spiral inductors, fabricated in a radio frequency (RF) GaN-on silicon technology, are exploited to estimate the errors of two lumped geometrically scalable models, i.e., a simple π-model with seven components and an advanced model with thirteen components. The comparison is performed by using either the standard performance parameters, such as inductance (L), quality factor (Q-factor), and self-resonance frequency (SRF), or the two-port scattering parameters (S-parameters). The comparison reveals that despite a higher complexity, the developed advanced model achieves a significant reduction in SRF percentage errors in a wide range of geometrical parameters, while enabling an accurate estimation of two-port S-parameters. Indeed, the correct evaluation of both SRF and two-port S-parameters is crucial to exploit the model in an actual circuit design environment by properly setting the inductor geometrical parameters to optimize RF performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spataro et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: