Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Descriptive-evaluative analysis examines data accuracy and user experience in public schools, suggesting improvements across varied locations.
This study examined the effectiveness of the National School Building Inventory (NSBI) system in public elementary and secondary schools that focused on its encoding procedures, data accuracy, user experience, and institutional support. Conducted in Tandag City, Surigao del Sur, the research aimed to uncover both the strengths and weaknesses of the system as it operates across different school levels in the division. Using a descriptive-evaluative quantitative approach, the study surveyed 129 respondents from 31 schools. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, such as frequency, mean, and standard deviation. The results showed that the NSBI system was largely seen as efficient in its encoding procedures, data accuracy, and overall user experience, with most indicators rated as “Very Efficient.” Despite this, the study revealed some challenges, particularly in areas like internet connectivity, technical support, and the smoothness of the data transition from encoding to submission, especially in rural schools. Urban schools had better access to resources, creating discrepancies in the system’s use across different locations. The need for more frequent and comprehensive training was also highlighted, as respondents expressed a desire for additional support to improve their familiarity and efficiency with the system. To address these challenges, the study recommended enhancing technical support, offering more targeted training sessions, bridging the resource gap between urban and rural schools, and improving communication between schools and division offices. Ultimately, this research contributed to the broader conversation about the implementation of educational technologies and provides actionable suggestions for making the NSBI system more effective and inclusive in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ajos et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: