This analysis compares machine learning classifiers for land cover mapping in an irrigation system, indicating improved resource management outcomes.
Accurate land cover classification is vital for informed water resource management, especially in irrigation-dependent regions facing increased climate variability. Using fused multi-sensor remote sensing imagery from Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2, this study assesses the effectiveness of three machine learning classifiers: Random Forest (RF), Gradient Tree Boosting (GTB), and Naive Bayes (NB) in creating land cover maps for the Tisza-Körös Valley Irrigation System (TIKEVIR) in Hungary. Water bodies, built-up areas, forests, grasslands, and major crops were among the important land cover categories that were classified for the two agricultural seasons (2018 and 2022). RF performed consistently in 2022 and reached its best accuracy in 2018 (OA = 0.87, KC = 0.83, PI = 0.94). While NB’s performance in 2022 remained less consistent, GTB’s performance increased. The findings show that RF works effectively for generating accurate land cover data, providing useful information for regional monitoring, and assisting in water and environmental management decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tamás et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: