Randomized trial compares deep learning models for land cover classification in diverse environments, indicating convolutional models yield superior results.
Accurate land cover mapping is a fundamental tool for environmental management and ecosystem monitoring. This study presents a comparative evaluation of four deep learning architectures, namely a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), UNet++, ConvNeXt and Vision Transformer (ViT), for land cover classification into five primary classes: water, cropland, forest, low/natural vegetation and built-up. The broader Lake Kerkini basin was selected as the primary training and evaluation area. The multispectral input data were generated through Google Earth Engine and consisted of multi-seasonal Sentinel-2 composite mosaics for the 2021 mapping year, covering winter, spring, summer and autumn. To obtain a more reliable performance estimate and mitigate the effects of spatial autocorrelation, a four-fold spatial cross-validation approach was implemented. Under this spatial validation framework, the convolution-based architectures achieved the strongest performance. CNN obtained the highest numerical fold-mean performance, with an overall accuracy of 81.53% and a macro-averaged F1 score (Macro-F1) of 80.09%, followed closely by UNet++ and ConvNeXt. Non-parametric repeated-measures statistical testing indicated a significant overall architecture effect, with CNN, UNet++ and ConvNeXt showing broadly comparable fold-level Macro-F1 performance, while the tested ViT configuration trained from scratch ranked last across all spatial folds. Regional transferability was further evaluated in the nearby independent Lake Doirani region, where the convolutional architectures, particularly CNN and UNet++, showed strong agreement with the WorldCover-derived reference labels without fine-tuning. Finally, feature-importance analysis indicated that specific spectral-seasonal channels, especially the Blue band (B2) in winter and the Short-Wave Infrared band (B12) in summer, were consistently influential in the models’ predictions. Overall, under the tested 2021 Mediterranean case-study conditions, the results highlight the importance of spatially rigorous validation and show that the evaluated convolution-based configurations achieved stronger performance than the tested ViT configuration trained from scratch.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gkologkinas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: