Analysis reveals micro credit improves quality of life and household income for women in Nigeria, suggesting a path toward sustainable development.
Women empowerment is a pivotal issue of developing countries, particularly in Asia and Africa. Zero poverty and gender equality are the distinctive goals among SDGs of the UN. Micro credit has been widely recognized in recent development to have positive consequences of societal economic development. However, most studies examine the impact of micro credit on some narrow indicators of well-being such as income, poverty, education and health. While these indicators do measure and represent the standard of living of the society, and are important development objectives, they focus only on the material aspect of well-being. Therefore, it does not really shed light on whether micro credit is associated with quality of life which is the subjective aspect of economic development. This raises the question of whether micro credit also leads to better quality of life. This research attempts to answer this question by encompassing the investigation not only on the impact of micro credit and its domains loan duration, training and loan size on income, but also on quality of life. The Multinomial logit model analysis technique was used to make empirical evidence to show the association between microcredit and quality of life. The cross sectional primary data that were obtained from a survey questionnaire of 400 women borrowers of the three microcredit provided banks, namely Microfinance bank, Agriculture credit and Loan Bank, Cooperatives and state poverty alleviation program in southwest was used for the analysis. The results show that micro credit and its three domains loan duration, training and loan size have an important impact on household income and on quality of life. These findings indicate that microcredit is an essential investment to achieve good quality of life in particularly economically undeveloped states and Local Government.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lasisi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: