Case study analysis highlights cultural logics in Sherdukpen folktales, suggesting semiotics is a dynamic framework.
Semiotics, the study of signs and signification, is often misunderstood as a singular, monolithic framework. However, a closer investigation reveals a constellation of complementary approaches—from structuralist linguistics and pragmatic philosophy to cultural, narrative, post-structural, and multimodal perspectives. This paper critically surveys the foundational and contemporary thinkers in semiotics including Saussure, Peirce, Barthes, Eco, Greimas, Derrida, and Kress & van Leeuwen. It then applies these theoretical insights to a case study analysis of Sherdukpen folktales, particularly Ha Sat Sat, Dong Sat Sat and Chong Pon, demonstrating how semiotic analysis reveals deeply embedded cultural logics, moral codes, and ideological functions. The paper argues for a holistic understanding of semiotics as a diverse, dynamic, and context-sensitive interpretive framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krushna Chandra Mishra (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: