Retrospective observational study on stoma closure outcomes in 130 patients, revealing low complication rates and effective outpatient management.
Objective: evaluate feasibility and outcomes of outpatient stoma closure. Background: Stoma closure is a routine procedure still associated with prolonged hospital stays, despite a low complication rate. We hypothesized that it could be performed in an outpatient setting. Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed prospectively collected data on outpatient stoma closures across 5 centers (5/2019-10/2024) was conducted. Inclusion required a caregiver on surgery day and no associated procedures. Follow-up consisted of phone consultations, a 24/7 emergency contact line, and routine outpatient appointment. Results: 130 patients (57% male, median age=60 y, ASA score 1-2=94%) were included. 122 loop ileostomies (94%), 5 loop colostomies (4%) and 3 ileocolostomies(3%) were closed. Stoma had been performed mainly after anterior resection (81%) or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (9%). The median interval before stoma closure was 70 days [7–2310]. Median operative time was 48 minutes [20–247]. Anastomosis was mainly stapled (55.4%). Wounds were closed either directly (56%) or with a purse-string technique (44%). Same-day discharge was possible for 90% of patients. Main reasons for admission were postoperative pain (n=5) and logistical issues (n=4). Median length of hospital stay was 10 hours.[4–16] 21 patients (16%) were readmitted after a median time of 6 days [1–14] (ileus=9, parietal abscess=5). Severe morbidity (Dindo III) was 3%. Direct wound closure was a risk factor of wound infection ( P =0.009). Steroid therapy was a risk factor of morbidity and readmission ( P <0.001). Conclusions: Outpatient stoma closure is a safe and effective approach with low complication and readmission rates when using appropriate protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Langavant et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: