Analysis reveals variable accuracy of microphysics schemes in predicting particle size distributions during lake-effect snow in the Great Lakes Region.
In the Great Lakes Region (GLR), lake-effect snow (LeS) events are a common occurrence, in which narrow, intense bands of convection cause snowfall downwind of the lakes. The shallow convection associated with LeS is dynamically different from deeper, synoptically-driven snow, and the particle size distributions (PSDs) of the precipitation have different shapes, as well. This work considers whether or not the Thompson-Eidhammer microphysics scheme, which includes single-moment prediction of snow, is accurate in estimating the PSDs of LeS convection. The HRRR configuration of the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) is used to simulate three different LeS events in the GLR using two different microphysics schemes: The Thompson-Eidhammer “Aerosol Aware” scheme, and the Morrison double-moment scheme. Model-estimated PSDs are calculated and compared to observed PSDs at three locations in the region: Marquette, Michigan, Gaylord, Michigan, and Buffalo, New York. Model predicted liquid-water equivalent snowfall and snow density are also compared to observed products. It is found that parameterization performance varies depending on location, with Thompson struggling to create the correct PSD shape for Marquette. Both microphysics schemes do not perform well in predicting particles greater than 6 mm in diameter except in Buffalo, where both simulated and observed PSDs contain snow particles greater than 10 mm in diameter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hutson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: