Commentary highlights spatial justice and equity in infrastructure-led urbanization, suggesting participatory methods for better decision-making.
This commentary extends shift ‘from infrastructure-led development to infrastructure-led urbanization’ by explicitly embedding a spatial justice lens. We define spatial justice in this context as the equitable distribution of infrastructural benefits and burdens, meaningful recognition of marginalized groups’ claims on urban space, and genuine participatory parity in decision-making. Drawing on feminist, environmental justice, postcolonial, and Indigenous scholarship, we show how major infrastructure projects often reproduce dispossession, displacement, and socio-ecological inequalities. Concrete contrasts – for example, co-designed transit schemes versus top-down megaproject evictions – illustrate how justice can be materially operationalized. Methodologically, we advocate corridor ethnographies, participatory GIS mapping, and algorithmic justice audits to document and redress infrastructural (in)justices. We conclude by calling for comparative, justice-sensitive research agendas and governance innovations – such as community benefit agreements and inclusive zoning – to ensure that global infrastructure corridors foster equity, inclusion, and collective care rather than marginalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: