Evaluation of Selected Fabricated Hadiths in Malaysia-Indonesia Through the Art of Matn Criticism

This study investigates the prevalence of fabricated hadiths in Malaysia and Indonesia through the framework of matn (textual) criticism. The central issue addressed is the widespread circulation of false hadiths and the need for systematic methods to identify them. Utilizing a qualitative approach, the study employs document analysis to examine selected hadiths commonly propagated in both regions. The analysis identifies five key indicators of fabrication: contradiction with authentic scriptural sources, inconsistency with historical facts, deviation from Shari‘ah principles, irrational content, and exaggerated rewards for minor acts. The findings reinforce the significance of matn criticism as a tool for hadith authentication. It is recommended that rational judgment (ʿAql) be integrated as a complementary evaluative criterion and that public awareness be strengthened to curb the spread of false religious narratives.