Analysis of superiority, equality, and parity in value relations, suggesting a clearer philosophical framework.
Some things hold value in a way that makes them superior to others, regardless of how much of the lesser values are involved. Philosophers have often found this idea of persistent betterness to be puzzling. In this paper, we argue that superiority belongs to a broader class of persistent value relations, including stubborn varieties of equality and parity, each of which will be exemplified and analysed. Our account explains these relations through the inherent properties of what is being compared without relying on infinite value or the notion of a diminishing value contribution. This approach offers a clearer understanding of the nature and grounds of persistent value relations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andersson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: