A light form of value realism is defended according to which objective properties of comparison objects make value comparisons true or false. If one object has such a better-making property and another lacks it, this is sufficient for the truth of a corresponding value comparison. However, better-making properties are only necessary and usually not sufficient parts of the justifications of value comparisons. The account is not reductionist; it remains consistent with error-theoretic positions and the view that there are normative facts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erich Rast (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: