Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis shows improved survival in pediatric patients with hemophagocytic syndrome, indicating efficacy of ruxolitinib with or without chemotherapy.
Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib, with or without intensive chemotherapy, in pediatric patients with hemophagocytic syndrome.Methods: Pediatric patients with newly diagnosed hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis treated with ruxolitinib between January 2021 and December 2024 were analyzed.Results: A total of 34 patients were included, with a median age of 45.6 months. The median ruxolitinib treatment duration was 62 days, with a median daily dosage of 0.63 mg/kg. Twenty-four patients received VP-16, while ten did not. Significant differences were observed in hemoglobin, sCD25, LDH, and ALT levels between the groups. The overall response rates at weeks 2, 4, and 8 were 73.5%, 76.4%, and 70.6% respectively. Platelets, ferritin, triglycerides, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, and liver function markers also changed significantly. The median follow-up was 502 days. Seven patients died, with a two-year overall survival rate of 78.3%, higher in the non-VP-16 group (90.0%) than the VP-16 group (73.2%). The two-year event-free survival rate was 63.2%, with 80.0% in the non-VP-16 group and 58.3% in the VP-16 group. Poor prognostic factors included high IL-6 levels, lack of response to initial ruxolitinib, and bone marrow hemophagocytic cells. The VP-16 dosage was reduced compared to HLH-1994, and no patients discontinued ruxolitinib due to side effects.Conclusion: Ruxolitinib is effective and safe for pediatric hemophagocytic syndrome, potentially reducing the need for etoposide. Its initial treatment response can serve as an important factor for prognostic analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: