Study develops self-assessment tool for schools to evaluate readiness for high school credit system, implying autonomy in implementation.
Purpose: This study aimed to develop a tool that individual schools can use to autonomously assess their readiness and operations for the implementation of the high school credit system. There is a need for monitoring whether the policy goals are being realized at the school level not through external evaluation, but through self-assessment by individual schools. Methods: A working group composed of experts and practicing teachers was formed to conduct focused discussions, reviews, and revisions by domain. Through this process, autonomous self-assessment elements for schools were identified, and questions were developed for each element. Results: The autonomous self-assessment elements were categorized into five major domains: operational system and culture, curriculum planning and operation, career and academic guidance, teaching, learning and assessment, and spatial design and utilization. These elements were structured in a way that allows schools to assess or evaluate them by verifying their presence or rating them using scales. Conclusion: The self-assessment elements serve as reference points to help individual schools determine what actions need to be taken. They can also be used by schools to evaluate their current operations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Young-Eun Kim (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: