The purpose of this study is to develop an evaluation rubric of admission officer system considering the high school credit system. Interviews with stakeholders, including high school teachers, admission officers, and evaluation experts, were conducted to derive evaluative elements that accurately reflect the High School Credit System and students' educational experiences. The outcome is a rubric with four dimensions: Career Exploration, Exploratory activity and level, Basic learning ability, and Sense of Paricipation and responsibility, each evaluated across three levels and within a nine-point scale. These dimensions are designed to assess various aspects such as students' career exploration, in-class inquiry activities, academic achievements, and individual talents, as evidenced in their school records. Then, this study verified the content validity of the evaluation rubric with content experts, aiming to present a more reliable evaluation tool. This rubric is anticipated to significantly enhance the objectivity and validity in the University Admission Officer System, while also serving as a guiding framework for students, teachers, and parents to understand and improve educational outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: