Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis reveals the rights to counsel in criminal proceedings for non-parties, suggesting improved participation standards.
The study analyses the issue of the availability of a counsel at law to persons who are not parties to criminal proceedings. It refers not only to the catalogue of entities authorised to appoint a counsel, but also to the grounds for refusing to allow such counsel to participate in procedural activities. Separate considerations are devoted to the issue of the procedure for participation of a counsel in a proceeding. In the final conclusions, de lege ferenda , it is proposed that the scope of the right to a counsel should be differentiated and should be made dependent on the level of protection of the interests of persons who are not parties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kosonoga et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: