Evaluation of Operation Safe Corridor's effectiveness in counter-terrorism suggests limited community acceptance of ex-Boko Haram militants.
This paper evaluates Operation Safe Corridor (OPSC), as a Nigerian counter-terrorism policy. Nigerian counter-terrorism policies have been criticised by scholars for its reliance on kinetic approaches, which is believed to have impinged on its effectiveness and efficiency. As a counter-terrorism policy, OPSC was introduced by federal government in September 2015 to provide demobilisation, de-radicalisation and reintegration routes to surrendering and repentant ex-Boko Haram combatants. Strategic Decision-Making Theory was applied as a theoretical framework. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used for data collection and analysis. The paper discovered that OPSC was introduced as non-kinetic counter-terrorism strategy as evidenced by 492(49.8%) of respondents. This paper concludes that OPSC has not directly helped in winning the hearts and minds of the general population in the terrorised/host communities as they have continued to stigmatise, and at most times, rejected the reintegration of ex-Boko-Haram combatants. The study, therefore, recommends restructuring of OPSC, to enable the operators differentiate those that surrendered willingly from those overwhelmed by hunger/starvation and the superior fire power of Nigerian counter-terrorist operators. To assuage the challenges faced with reintegration of the ex-Boko Haram militants, the research recommends amongst others, the prioritization of welfare of victims of Boko Haram attacks in terrorised communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roberts et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: