The research derives an analytical solution for dynamic stress in adjacent tunnels, highlighting stress propagation results and crack control implications.
In tunnel blasting, an analytical solution for dynamic stress in the surrounding rock of adjacent tunnels is critical for dynamic response analysis, mechanical evaluations, and crack propagation control. Previous studies on stress field analytical solutions primarily modeled rock as a linear elastic material, focusing mainly on the P-wave effects from instantaneous detonation. Based on Heelan’s short cylindrical cavity model, this paper derives an analytical solution for blast-induced dynamic stresses in adjacent tunnel rock, incorporating both induced SV-waves and a rock mass damage factor through rigorous theoretical analysis. Numerical case studies and field measurements were used to analyze stress propagation during tunnel blasting, and theoretical results were compared with measured data. The key findings were as follows: Radial stress > axial stress > hoop stress. All three stresses decay with increasing distance and damage factor, following an inversely proportional relationship with distance. Radial stress decays faster than axial and hoop stresses. Stress also decays exponentially over time, with the peak occurring after the transverse wave arrival. The theoretical results show approximately 10% deviation from the existing empirical formulas, while field measurements closely match the theoretical model, showing consistent stress trends and an average error of 7.02% (radial), 7.56% (axial) and 7.05% (hoop), confirming the reliability of the proposed analytical solution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: