Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates stress wave behavior in tunnel blasting, suggesting implications for engineering safety.
To examine the dynamic response of tunnel floor slabs subjected to blasting under varying stress conditions, a numerical model was developed to simulate blasting effects at different tunnel depths. This model integrated Hopkinson bar experiments conducted under confining pressure with the Riedel–Hiermaier–Thoma (RHT) constitutive framework. The study subsequently investigated the effects of geostress fields, tunnel depth and tunnel inclination on the propagation characteristics of stress waves. Additionally, the mechanisms stress wave transmission and the damage evolution within the rock mass were analyzed. Results from the numerical simulations reveal that increasing the charge depth diminishes the dissipation of post-blasting stress waves toward the free surface, thereby concentrating stress wave propagation within the rock mass and substantially amplifying shock wave intensity and impact loading. Moreover, elevated stress levels in the surrounding rock increase the peak stress wave amplitude, constrain damage propagation on the tunnel’s upper side, and redirect more stress waves toward deeper regions of the model. Increasing tunnel inclination was also found to intensify stress concentration and augment stress wave intensity. Notably, at a tunnel inclination of 5°, stress wave intensity attains its maximum; beyond this angle, the development of stress waves exhibits irregular patterns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: