Quantitative analysis shows workplace factors significantly affect employee performance at PT Bumi Pertiwi Mandiri, suggesting managerial implications.
The purpose of this study is to ascertain how employee performance at PT is impacted by the work environment and motivation. The planet Earth is self-sufficient. The quantitative approach is the research methodology employed. The study's population consists of all 80 employees of PT Bumi Pertiwi Mandiri. By selecting all 80 members of the population as respondents, the sampling strategy employed a saturation sampling technique. Methods of gathering data include questionnaires and observation. Tests of validity, reliability, class assumptions, simple and multiple linear regression, correlation coefficient (R) tests, determination tests (R Square), and hypothesis testing (t tests and F tests) were the data analysis techniques employed. The results of the study showed that the Work Environment partially had a significant effect on Employee Performance with a regression equation Y = 2.868 + 0.068 X1 and an influence contribution of 48.1%, the hypothesis test obtained a value of t_hitung > t_tabel or (8.183 > 1.991). Work Motivation partially had a significant effect on Employee Performance with a regression equation Y = 3.617 + 0.088X2 and an influence contribution of 59.2%, the hypothesis test obtained a value of t_hitung > t_tabel or (3.629> 1.991). Work Motivation and Work Environment simultaneously had a significant effect on Employee Performance with a regression equation Y = 2.940 + 0.082X1 + 0.084X2 and an influence contribution of 72.2%, the hypothesis test obtained a value of F_hitung > F_tabel or (100.082 > 3.963)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuniarti et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: