Quasi-experimental study reveals significant improvements in anxiety and self-efficacy for HPV vaccination among female adolescents, suggesting digital interventions may enhance uptake.
Background: Cervical cancer in Indonesia is a major public health concern, with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination being a key preventive measure. However, psychosocial barriers like anxiety and low self-efficacy hinder vaccination uptake among female adolescents, requiring web-based psychoeducation interventions. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a web-based psychoeducation programme on anxiety, self-efficacy, and decision-making support regarding HPV vaccination among female adolescents in Indonesia. Methods: A quasi-experimental study design was employed, involving 200 female adolescents aged 15–19 years, divided equally into intervention and control groups. The intervention group received a structured web-based psychoeducation programme, while the control group received standard information. Psychosocial outcomes were assessed using validated instruments: Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale. Pre- and post-intervention data were analysed using paired t-tests, ANCOVA, and MANCOVA. Results: The intervention group showed significant improvements in anxiety reduction (mean difference: -9.7, p<0.001), self-efficacy enhancement (mean difference: 8.0, p<0.001), and decision-making support (mean difference: 7.9, p<0.001) compared to the control group. Effect sizes indicated moderate to strong impacts across all psychosocial dimensions. Conclusion: Web-based psychoeducation significantly improves psychosocial outcomes, including anxiety, self-efficacy, and decision-making support, among female adolescents. These findings highlight the potential of digital interventions in promoting HPV vaccination acceptance and addressing mental health challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mutiar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: