Editorial highlights the need for incorporating prosthodontic rehabilitation early in oncology, suggesting enhanced patient outcomes and improved communication among specialists.
Head and neck cancers often require aggressive treatments such as surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, which, although effective in tumor control, frequently lead to debilitating anatomical and functional impairments. Speech disturbances, impaired mastication, and facial disfigurement severely affect patients' quality of life. Despite its critical role in restoring these vital functions, prosthodontic rehabilitation remains underutilized, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Maxillofacial prosthodontists provide essential services, including obturators, speech aids, and facial prostheses, yet they are rarely included in the early phases of oncology treatment planning. Delayed referral often results in limited prosthetic success due to tissue fibrosis and psychological burden. Early involvement, ideally at diagnosis or preoperative planning, enables better anatomical preservation, timely impressions, and improved outcomes through immediate rehabilitation strategies. Barriers to integration include a lack of awareness among oncologists, poor interdisciplinary communication, limited infrastructure, and insufficient training in oncologic prosthodontics. In regions like India, this is exacerbated by a shortage of trained specialists and uneven access to care. Educational reforms and policy initiatives are urgently needed to standardize early prosthodontic referral and expand rehabilitative services. This editorial underscores the pressing need for systemic change to incorporate prosthodontists as integral members of oncology teams. Ensuring timely, multidisciplinary care can restore not only physical function but also psychological well-being and social confidence, thus redefining survivorship through a more holistic approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Srivastava et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: