High-throughput screening reveals axial ligands regulate C1 and C2 product selectivity in electrocatalysts, implying potential design strategies.
A primary challenge in the carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO2RR) is the rational design and engineering of high-efficiency electrocatalysts. A series of M1M2N6 catalysts (M1M2 = NiNi, CoNi, CoFe, CoCo) with precisely tailored axial ligands (R = -OH, -COH, -CN) have been high-throughput screened out to exhibit optimal electrocatalytic activity, which is extended to further estimate their CO2RR performance in this work. The adsorption energies of three distinct ligands at the M1-M2 bridge site are evaluated to quantitatively assess the ligand stabilization. On pristine and ligand-engineered M1M2N6 catalysts, the free energy variation along CO2RR pathways leading to C1 products reveals that the initial proton-coupled electron transfer to form the *HCOO/*COOH intermediate is the main potential-limiting step of yielding the key intermediate CO*. The formation barrier energy difference of <0.06 eV between *HCOO and *COOH intermediates on pristine CoCo/CoFe/CoNi and CN-functionalized CoFe/CoCo catalysts facilitates *CO intermediate generation and enables the subsequent *CO-*CO coupling to C2 products for formation of C2H5OH and C2H6. However, -COH and -OH modification excludes *CO-intermediate formation and directs the reaction toward CH4 and CH3OH production due to the large kinetic energy difference of 0.96-1.11 eV between *HCOO and *COOH. Our results provide a possible axial ligand engineering strategy of regulating C1/C2 product selectivity on different dual-atom catalysts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: