Qualitative exploration reveals silence as both a survival strategy and expression of powerlessness in emotionally abused women.
Objective: This study aimed to explore the contextual meanings and psychological functions of silence among emotionally abused married women within the sociocultural context of Taiwan. Methods and Materials: A qualitative research design based on a phenomenological approach was employed to capture the lived experiences of silence among emotionally abused women. Eighteen married women residing in Taiwan, aged between 28 and 52, participated in semi-structured in-depth interviews. Participants were selected through purposive sampling based on their self-reported experiences of emotional abuse in marriage. Interviews were conducted in Mandarin, transcribed, and translated into English. Thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke’s six-phase approach was conducted using NVivo 14 software. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Trustworthiness was ensured through member checking, peer debriefing, and reflexive memoing. Findings: Analysis revealed three overarching themes: (1) Silence as a Survival Strategy, which included subthemes such as avoiding conflict, emotional self-protection, and coping with fear; (2) Silence as a Form of Powerlessness, encompassing internalized helplessness, social isolation, and emotional paralysis; and (3) Silence as a Communicative Expression, including symbolic resistance, testing boundaries, and expressing disappointment. Participants articulated silence as both a protective behavior and a means of emotional regulation, shaped by cultural norms, relational dynamics, and personal history. Selected interview quotations supported each thematic category. Conclusion: Silence among emotionally abused married women is a multidimensional phenomenon that reflects adaptive coping, emotional suffering, and sociocultural conditioning. Rather than viewing silence as passive submission, practitioners and researchers should recognize it as a complex and context-sensitive response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthews et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: