Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis shows the expanding role of text-as-data in economics, highlighting its contradictions with key principles like revealed preferences.
Formal quantitative methods of text analysis – approaches collectively called “text-as-data” – are playing an increasingly important role in contemporary social sciences. At the same time, while their introduction in political science and partly in sociology is a natural process, largely consistent with the logic of the development of these disciplines, the place of “text-as-data” in economics is ambiguous; while corresponding to the general trends towards mastering an ever-growing range of quantitative methods, “text-as-data” at the same time contradicts some important principles of economics – in particular, attention to revealed preferences rather than rhetoric, and the principles of the “credibility revolution”. The growing role of “text-as-data” demonstrates the complex and nonlinear nature of the progress of quantitative methods in economics (and in the social sciences in general).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexander Libman (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: