This article reveals the role of psychological defenses and archetypes in promoting peace, indicating interdisciplinary connections.
Guided by the mythopoetic energies of peace, the author engages in an innovative depth psychological inquiry into the interconnected theories of analytical psychology and peace studies, emphasizing their relevance and functions at the archetypal, cultural, and individual levels. Linking the writings of psychologists Freud, Jung, von Franz and Hillman with peace scholar Galtung and peace literacy educator Chappell, six theoretical applications are illuminated: (a) archetype; (b) symbol; (c) psychological defence mechanisms; (d) key factors of positive peace; (e) clinical temenos and kairos; and (f) an individualized positive peace care plan. Explorations into the interstices between these sister disciplines and their mutual challenges are under‐represented in the extant literature. Addressing this lacuna, the author offers an interdisciplinary analysis into the ways in which analytical psychology and peace studies theoretically support one another and work together towards promoting peace‐centred psychologies and practices. This article will interest individuals endeavouring to better understand peace through a psychological lens, and who work within the fields of analytical psychology, peace psychology, social justice, or with individuals who strive to have “peace” in their lives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michelle Rivera-Clonch (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: