Models demonstrate superior error performance in predicting S-parameters for GaAs pHEMT, suggesting ELM's stability may enhance reliability.
Based on long short term memory (LSTM) neural network and extreme learning machine (ELM) neural network, two small‐signal models of gallium arsenide (GaAs) pseudo‐crystalline high electron mobility transistor (pHEMT) are established and analyzed in this paper. To verify these models, 10‐fold cross‐validation and feature ranking are performed on 600 sets of the scattering parameters (S‐parameters) for GaAs pHEMT. Experimental results show that the LSTM is better than other S‐parameters when predicting ReS 12 , with the mean square error (MSE) of 6.2483 × 10 −05 , the mean absolute error (MAE) of 6.38 × 10 −03 , and the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) of 9.1013 × 10 −01 . On the other hand, the ELM model achieves better MSE, MAE, and R 2 values of 1.3946 × 10 −06 , 7.6491 × 10 −04 , and 9.9697 × 10 −01 , respectively. Meanwhile, MSE and MAE of ELM are smaller than LSTM when predicting all the S‐parameters. In addition, it shows a smaller fluctuation range of the error curve for ELM, indicating that it is more stable than LSTM. Therefore, ELM is an effective method to model the small‐signal of GaAs pHEMT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: