What type of study is this?

This is a In Vitro Study study.

September 10, 2025The Saudi Dental JournalOpen Access

Accuracy of one-versus two-phase photogrammetry implant impression system: an in-vitro study

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

AJAtith JiranaphawiboonPrince of Songkla University DRDinesh RokayaChulalongkorn University SSSasiwimol SanohkanPrince of Songkla University

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

In-vitro analysis finds no significant difference in accuracy of one-phase and two-phase photogrammetry techniques for implants, suggesting both methods are viable.

Key Points

Both one-phase and two-phase photogrammetry implant impressions demonstrated similar levels of accuracy.
The study showed discrepancies within the prescribed range for optimal implant support prostheses (< 100 µm).
Group I and Group II exhibited no significant differences in linear, angular, and overall discrepancies.
The results suggest that either photogrammetry technique is suitable for complete arch implant support applications.

Cite This Study

Jiranaphawiboon et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c1cc4754b1d3bfb60f4d59 https://doi.org/10.1007/s44445-025-00040-z

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

In-vitro analysis finds no significant difference in accuracy of one-phase and two-phase photogrammetry techniques for implants, suggesting both methods are viable.

Accuracy of one-versus two-phase photogrammetry implant impression system: an in-vitro study

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Accuracy of one-versus two-phase photogrammetry implant impression system: an in-vitro study

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider