Analysis of generative design enhances iteration efficiency in mass personalization, indicating potential improvements.
This study examines generative design (GD) within mass personalization (MP) workflows, using custom dental implant abutments as a case study. Selected for their complex functional requirements, a parametric model developed in Rhino3D and Grasshopper, augmented with Wallacei for optimization, was compared to conventional industrial CAD approaches. GD automates design iterations and handles multi-objective optimizations, with performance improvements achieved by segmenting the parametric model. However, GD requires precise parameterization, posing challenges for less experienced designers. While GD enhances iteration efficiency and explores complex design spaces, its computational demands and limited adaptability to extensive geometric variations reduce overall efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kosec et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: