Cross-sectional analysis developed a nomogram to predict cognitive frailty in community-dwelling older adults, suggesting valuable early intervention strategies.
Cognitive frailty (CF), characterised by the co-occurrence of physical frailty and mild cognitive impairment, poses significant risks for adverse health outcomes in community-dwelling older adults, yet effective prediction tools remain limited. This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram model for predicting CF risk in community-dwelling older adults based on multidimensional mental and physical functional markers. A cross-sectional analysis included 481 participants (mean age 69.2 ± 7.3 years; 60.3% female) from Shanghai communities. Assessments encompassed cognitive function (MoCA), physical frailty (EFS), mental health (GDS-15, PSQI), nutritional status (MNA-SF), and physical performance (grip strength, TUG test, standing on one leg with eyes closed/open tests). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified predictors, followed by nomogram construction and internal validation via bootstrapping (500 resamples). CF prevalence was 41.4% (199/481). Six independent predictors were identified: chronic disease status (OR = 2.587), malnutrition (OR = 0.852), depressive symptoms (OR = 1.062), poor sleep quality (OR = 1.245), impaired mobility (TUG time: OR = 1.100), and balance deficits (Time to stand on one leg with eyes closed time: OR = 0.935). The nomogram demonstrated moderate discrimination (C-index = 0.761, 95% CI = 0.718-0.804) and excellent calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.19). Internal validation confirmed robustness (corrected C-index = 0.761). This nomogram integrates easily accessible mental and physical functional markers, offering a practical tool for early CF risk stratification in community settings. Its application may guide personalised interventions to mitigate cognitive and functional decline in ageing populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: