Key result
A six-predictor nomogram predicts cognitive frailty in ACS patients with an AUC of ~0.85.
Why the study?
Cognitive frailty is strongly associated with major adverse cardiovascular events, but its assessment requires specialized equipment that limits clinical practicality.
Does a diagnostic nomogram model accurately predict cognitive frailty in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Observational (n=547)
No
Does a diagnostic nomogram model accurately predict cognitive frailty in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome?
A novel nomogram incorporating education, age, SBP, CCI, SPPB, and nutritional status can effectively predict cognitive frailty in older patients with acute coronary syndrome, facilitating early identification and intervention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support early identification of cognitive frailty in ACS; leaves open external validation before clinical adoption.
Background: Cognitive frailty (CF) is strongly associated with major adverse cardiovascular events, yet its assessment requires specialized equipment, limiting clinical practicality. This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram model for predicting CF in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to enhance early identification and intervention. Methods: Patients with ACS (N=547) were enrolled and randomly split into a training set (70%) and a testing set (30%). The training set was used to construct the nomogram, while the testing set was used for validation. Model performance was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) to assess discrimination, accuracy, and clinical utility, respectively. Results: The nomogram included six predictors: education level, age, systolic blood pressure (SBP), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and nutritional status. The model demonstrated strong discriminatory power, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.854 (95% CI: 0.741-0.861) in the training cohort and 0.733 (95% CI: 0.500-0.898) in the testing cohort. Calibration analysis confirmed high accuracy, and DCA indicated significant net benefits across both cohorts, supporting its clinical applicability. Conclusion: The nomogram effectively predicts CF in ACS patients by considering education, age, SBP, CCI, SPPB, and nutritional status, serving as a visual aid for healthcare providers to facilitate the early identification and intervention of CF. Future research is needed to validate the nomogram's efficacy in diverse populations and explore standardized assessment methods that enhance its clinical applicability in mitigating CF in ACS patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=547). Diagnostic nomogram model was evaluated on Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for predicting cognitive frailty in the training cohort (AUC 0.854, 95% CI 0.741-0.861). A diagnostic nomogram incorporating six clinical predictors effectively predicted cognitive frailty in acute coronary syndrome patients with an AUC of 0.854.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: