PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 16, 20254 citations

The role of stress-induced hyperglycemia in acute coronary syndromes: pathophysiology, novel markers and clinical implications.

View Full Paper
MBMarios G. BantidosNSNikolaos StalikasBFBarbara Fyntanidou

Key Points

  • Stress-induced hyperglycemia is linked to higher mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients, impacting clinical outcomes.
  • Key evidence includes the stress-hyperglycemia ratio, showing its prognostic value compared to traditional measures.
  • The narrative review assesses current markers of SIH in ACS, emphasizing glycemic variability in patient management.
  • Understanding the mechanisms of SIH could reshape patient risk stratification strategies in acute coronary syndrome.

Abstract

Stress-Induced Hyperglycemia (SIH) represents a transient increase in blood glucose levels triggered by acute physiological stress, frequently observed in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). It is linked to adverse outcomes, including higher mortality and an increased risk of Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE). Despite this, SIH remains inadequately defined and underappreciated in clinical risk assessment and patient management. This narrative review delves into the mechanistic underpinnings of SIH in ACS (neuroendocrine, metabolic and inflammatory pathways). Evidence on current SIH markers including the Stress-Hyperglycemia Ratio (SHR), Admission Blood Glucose, Glycemic Gap, and Glycemic Variability was identified through searches of PubMed/MEDLINE for English-language human studies published between January 2017 and May 2025 (certain seminal earlier studies were also retained), with a focus on key subpopulations (diabetes, non-diabetes, and MINOCA). Particular emphasis is placed on SHR as a ratio of acute to chronic hyperglycemia with expanding prognostic applications. SIH is a multifaceted phenomenon, superiorly reflected by dynamic indices like SHR rather than traditional measures. Further research into the mechanisms linking SIH with adverse outcomes could lay the groundwork for interventional trials, ultimately reshaping ACS patient risk-stratification and management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bantidos et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c93fe601120bef803baeb0https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2025.2561068
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Admission glucose, HbA1c levels and inflammatory cytokines in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction2025 · 3 citations
  2. 2Significance of day-to-day glucose variability in patients after acute coronary syndrome2021 · 7 citations
  3. 3Prognostic value of stress hyperglycemia ratio in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review with Bayesian and frequentist meta-analysis2023 · 82 citations
  4. 4Tumor Necrosis Factor‐Alpha: Role in Development of Insulin Resistance and Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus2017 · 695 citations
  5. 5Serine/Threonine Phosphorylation of IRS-1 Triggers Its Degradation2001 · 298 citations