Key result
Stress induced hyperglycemia in patients with STEMI was independently associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (aHR 1.802).
Why the study?
Stress induced hyperglycemia is common in STEMI, but evidence regarding its role on angiographic outcomes and prognosis is scarce.
Does stress induced hyperglycemia increase the risk of adverse angiographic findings and MACCE in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
Cohort (n=309)
Blinded outcome assessment
No
Does stress induced hyperglycemia increase the risk of adverse angiographic findings and MACCE in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
Hazard Ratio: 1.802 (95% CI 1.01–3.21)
Absolute Event Rate: 30.6% vs 17%
p-value: p=0.005
Stress-induced hyperglycemia in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI is an independent predictor of adverse angiographic findings and increased long-term MACCE, regardless of baseline diabetes status.
May aid risk stratification in STEMI; hypothesis-generating for glucose control trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Stress induced hyperglycemia (SIH) is common among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), even in patients without diabetes mellitus. However, evidence regarding its role on the angiographic outcomes and the prognosis of patients presenting with STEMI is scarce. METHODS: This study included 309 consecutively enrolled STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Patients were diagnosed with SIH if blood glucose on admission was > 140 mg/dl. Also, patients had to fast for at least 8 hours before blood sampling. The objective was to assess whether SIH was associated with major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular (MACCE) events and explore its relationship with angiographic predictors of worse prognosis such as poor initial TIMI flow, intracoronary thrombus burden, distal embolization, and presence of residual thrombus after pPCI. RESULTS: SIH in diabetic and non-diabetic patients was associated with a higher incidence of LTB (aOR = 2.171, 95% CI 1.27-3.71), distal embolization (aOR = 2.71, 95% CI 1.51-4.86), and pre-procedural TIMI flow grade = 0 (aOR = 2.69, 95% CI 1.43-5.04) after adjusting for relevant clinical variables. Importantly, during a median follow-up of 1.7 years STEMI patients with SIH with or without diabetes experienced increased occurrence of MACCE both in univariate (HR = 1.92, 95% CI 1.19-3.01) and multivariate analysis (aHR = 1.802, 95% CI 1.01-3.21). CONCLUSIONS: SIH in STEMI patients with or without diabetes was independently associated with increased MACCE. This could be attributed to the fact that SIH was strongly correlated with poor pre-procedural TIMI flow, LTB, and distal embolization. Large clinical trials need to validate SIH as an independent predictor of adverse angiographic and clinical outcomes to provide optimal individualized care for patients with STEMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stalikas et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=309). Stress induced hyperglycemia (SIH) vs. Without stress induced hyperglycemia was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (aHR 1.802, 95% CI 1.01-3.21, p=0.005). Stress induced hyperglycemia in patients with STEMI was independently associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (aHR 1.802).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: