Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantitative study shows moral development management has a positive connection to student performance, implying other factors play a larger role.
This research aims to determine the effect of moral development management on student performance at MTS Ash-Sholeh, Ibun District, Bandung Regency. The background of this research is the importance of moral development in improving the quality of students, both from spiritual and academic aspects. The method used is a quantitative approach with associative research type, involving all 19 students using saturated sampling techniques. Data were collected through questionnaires, observations, and documentation, then analyzed using validity tests, reliability tests, Pearson correlation, simple linear regression, t-tests, and F-tests with the help of SPSS version 25. The results show that the moral development management at MTS Ash-Sholeh is categorized as very good (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.933), while student performance is also categorized as good (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.792). The correlation test obtained a value of r = 0.325 with R² = 0.106, which means that only 10.6% of the variation in student performance is influenced by moral development management, while 89.4% is influenced by other factors. The regression test resulted in the equation Y = 13.768 + 0.657X with a t-value of 5.143 > t-table of 1.734 and an F-value of 26.447 > F-table of 4.49, indicating a positive but not significant influence between moral development management and student performance. This study concludes that although moral development is well-implemented and student performance is considered good, factors outside of moral character have a more dominant influence on student performance
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hanafiah et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: