Observational analysis demonstrates excellent diagnostic performance of plasma p-tau217 in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease, highlighting clinical utility.
BackgroundPlasma p-tau217 shows exceptional diagnostic performance for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in cohort studies. Recent real-world studies support its validity in more diverse populations.ObjectiveTest the performance of plasma p-tau217 in representative real-world early-onset cognitive disorders patients.Methods118 adult patients with cognitive complaints or potential neurodegenerative diseases (ND) from a single healthcare network in Melbourne, Australia, were categorized into three groups based on clinical diagnosis: non-ND (n = 52), early-onset AD (EOAD, n = 39), and non-AD ND (other-ND, n = 27). Plasma p-tau217 was measured using the Simoa® ALZpath p-Tau 217 Assay.ResultsPlasma p-tau217 was elevated in EOAD (mean ± SD: 1.13 ± 0.51) compared with non-ND (0.31 ± 0.27, p = 5.43e-23) and other-ND (0.23 ± 0.10, p = 9.65e-21). ROC analysis revealed excellent diagnostic performance, with AUCs of 0.944 [95% CI:0.893-0.996] for EOAD versus non-ND and 0.984 [0.962-1.000] for EOAD versus other-ND. Using a binary cut-off (p-tau217 > 0.42 pg/mL), 17% non-ND, 95% EOAD and 7% other-ND were A + . Using a two-tiered cut-off approach (0.40 pg/mL > p-tau217 > 0.63 pg/mL), 4% non-ND, 94% EOAD and 0% other-ND were A + . 10% of participants (n = 12) were within the intermediate range. Using the binary cut-off of p-tau217 > 0.64 pg/mL for T+, 100% EOAD and 0% other-ND A + participants, defined by the two-tiered cut-off approach, were T + . No associations of p-tau217 with age, sex, or ethnicity were found within ND groups. P-tau217 was elevated in individuals with severely impaired renal function.ConclusionsThe findings support the clinical utility of plasma p-tau217 in the real-world diagnostic evaluation of EOAD. However, careful interpretation of false positive results in patients with severe renal impairment is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chatterjee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: