Autoethnographic analysis uncovers the impact of Chile's dictatorship on exiled children's narratives, questioning neutrality in research.
Reconstruction of historical memory is necessary to understand and to make visible the consequence of Chile’s civil-military dictatorship (1973-1990) that has directly, indirectly, and intergenerationally affected a social community. However, what happens when the researcher is part of that social community? Is it necessary or possible to approach this topic with scientific neutrality? How do you explore your traumatic past through the eye of the other? When does exile end? This autoethnographic essay attempts to answer these questions and reflects upon them from the methodological and theoretical perspective of one of the social actors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verónica Márquez Moreno (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: