Cross-sectional analysis finds significant links among calcium score, stenosis severity, and cardiac troponin I levels in CAD patients, suggesting insights into myocardial injury.
Background. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of mortality, often associated with myocardial fibrosis and acute coronary syndromes. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-TnI) are valuable markers for cardiovascular risk assessment, yet their correlation with stenosis severity remains incompletely understood. Methods. This cross-sectional study analyzed secondary data from multislice computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) and hs-TnI tests of CAD patients in Makassar from January 2021 to August 2024. Correlation analysis between CAC score, stenosis severity, and hs-TnI levels was performed using Pearson’s or Spearman’s tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results. Of 424 samples, 55 met inclusion criteria (20 acute CAD, 35 chronic CAD). The median hs-TnI level was higher in acute CAD (7.55 ng/L) than chronic CAD (3.00 ng/L). In acute CAD, CAC scores were most frequently minimal (30%), whereas chronic CAD had the highest proportion in the none calcification (40%). Regarding the degree of stenosis, category 3 was the most prevalent in the acute CAD group, observed in 25% (5 samples), while in chronic CAD, the most common stenosis degree was 0 group (31.4%). A significant correlation was observed between CAC score and hs-TnI (p = 0.043, r = 0.456) and between stenosis severity and hs-TnI (p = 0.046, r = 0.450). Additionally, CAC scores strongly correlated with stenosis severity (p = 0.002, r = 0.661). Conclusion. The observed correlation between calcium score, stenosis severity, and hs-TnI levels suggests a meaningful correlation between anatomical findings and myocardial injury in coronary artery disease. These parameters may complement each other in improving cardiovascular risk assessment and clinical evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wibowo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: