Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis shows joint attention and social abilities predict expressive language in minimally verbal autistic children, indicating significant implications for early intervention.
Background: Most preschool autistic children exhibit substantial language delays, yet only ~25% remain minimally verbal (MV) throughout life. Previous studies have demonstrated that development of expressive language abilities is crucial for improving long-term outcomes. This study aimed to identify early predictors of later expressive language development specifically in MV preschool autistic children. Methods: We analyzed prospective data collected from 99 MV autistic children, who were 27.7 months old at diagnosis, on average. All children completed an ADOS-2 assessment at diagnosis and again 12-24 months later. We classified children into three expressive language groups at follow up: MV, one-word phase, and phrases phase. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify significant predictors of expressive language abilities at follow up. Predictors included ADOS-2 social affect (SA) calibrated severity scores (CSS), ADOS-2 restricted and repetitive behavior (RRB) CSS, cognitive scores, and joint attention (JA) scores, derived from a summation of six ADOS-2 items. Results: Children who successfully developed expressive language abilities at follow-up (i.e., were in the one-word or phrases groups) had significantly lower ADOS-2 SA CSS and JA scores at diagnosis. Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that both ADOS-2 SA CSS and JA scores at diagnosis predicted expressive language outcomes while cognitive scores and ADOS-2 RRB CSS did not. Moreover, concurrent improvements in JA were significantly larger in children who developed expressive language. Conclusions: Preschool MV autistic children with better social abilities, and specifically JA abilities, at diagnosis were more likely to develop expressive language within 1-2 years. JA scores derived from the ADOS-2 offer an easily accessible and widely available measure with important prognostic value for these children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nitzan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: