Preclinical analysis shows lipid nanoparticle delivery of miR-187 improves cardiac function in sepsis, indicating a novel therapeutic approach.
Background: Sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction is a common and critical complication of sepsis. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) from clonally expanded immortalized mesenchymal stromal cells (ciMSCs) contain microRNAs that may be exploited as therapy. Methods: In mouse models of septic cardiomyopathy induced by caecum ligation and puncture, cardiac function was determined by invasive and echocardiographic assessment. Primary cardiomyocytes derived from foetal murine and human adult ventricular tissue, as well as murine hearts were used for mechanistic studies. Studies using post-mortem human hearts or patient plasma, and clinical and echocardiographic measurements were used to establish translational relevance. Results: In preclinical models of sepsis, intravenous administration of either MSCs or ciMSC-EVs, given after the induction of sepsis, prevented a decrease in myocardial ejection fraction, ventricular inflammation, and mortality compared to placebo or platelet-derived control EVs. EV-microRNA sequencing identified enrichment for microRNA-187a-3p (miR-187) in ciMSC-EVs. miR-187 is anti-inflammatory; with interleukin-6 (IL-6) as its major target. Intravenous delivery of lipid nanoparticle (LNP) encapsulated miR-187 improved cardiac function, reduced inflammation, and enhanced survival of septic mice. In cardiomyocytes and in murine hearts, LNP-miR-187 reduces inflammation and expression of myocardial transcription factors linked to fetal gene reactivation in failing septic hearts. In human septic hearts, low circulating miR-187 levels correlate with reduced cardiac function and high sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores. Conclusion: These findings support the development of first-in-class, cell-free, miRNA-based therapy as a novel approach to treat sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy to address a critical gap in sepsis care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ektesabi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: