Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis shows deep learning struggles to segment calcifications in cardiac MRI, indicating challenges in assessing aortic stenosis severity.
Motivation: Contrast-enhanced CT is the gold standard for TAVI planning but unsuitable for patients with kidney disease or contrast allergies. Contrast-free MRI is an alternative but lacks visualization of calcifications. Goal(s): Use Deep Learning models to segment calcified regions on contrast-free CMR Quantify from the CMR the calcified area, indicator of aortic stenosis severity Approach: We performed CTA-CMR registration with Elastix using aorta masks, then trained several SOTA Deeo Leaning models using CMR images and CTA-to-CMR registered calcification masks. Results: Segmentation of aorta valve calcifications showed low DSC (0.309), while aorta wall calcifications could not be estimated. Valves' calcified area was underestimated by 25.96%. Impact: Calcifications are not visible on contrast-free CMR to the human eye, so we tested AI segmentation using CTA-registered labels, achieving low results (DSC 0.309). While a larger dataset or improved registration may help, the task's physical feasibility remains uncertain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: