Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluating readout alternation to improve motion robustness of GRE-based T2 mapping in pediatric patients, suggesting enhanced diagnostic capabilities.
Motivation: Motion artifacts in liver T2 mapping hinder accurate diagnosis in pediatric patients. Existing GRE-based T2 mapping methods are sensitive to motion, reducing their clinical utility for whole-liver imaging. Goal(s): To evaluate whether readout alternation (ROA) improves the motion robustness of GRE-based T2 mapping for pediatric liver imaging. Approach: Motion phantom and pediatric volunteer studies were conducted using GRE-based T2 mapping with and without ROA. T2 map quantitative accuracy was assessed under motion conditions. Results: ROA reduced motion artifacts, improving T2 map homogeneity and measurement consistency in both phantom and volunteer studies, demonstrating enhanced motion robustness in GRE-based T2 mapping. Impact: Implementing readout alternation (ROA) in GRE-based T2 mapping enhances motion robustness, enabling reliable whole-liver imaging. This advancement may improve diagnostic capabilities for liver diseases and encourage broader clinical adoption of rapid T2 mapping techniques in populations prone to motion artifacts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tamada et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: