Prospective study compared beat sensor and ECG for cardiac MRI, showing similar image quality and improved metrics.
Motivation: Traditional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) relies on electrocardiography (ECG) for triggering, which involves complex preparation and is susceptible to false triggering due to magnetic field interference. Goal(s): To evaluate the clinical feasibility of beat sensor (BS) for efficient heartbeat-triggered cardiac MR scanning. Approach: In a prospective study, 50 participants underwent cardiac MRI triggered by both BS and ECG, with assessments of image quality and quantitative parameters. Results: BS-triggered cardiac MRI showed comparable image quality and quantitative metrics to ECG, with higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in Cine and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in LGE images. Impact: This study demonstrates the clinical feasibility of BS-triggering for cardiac MRI, offering a viable alternative to ECG triggering, and potentially enhancing the quality of Cine and LGE images.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qian et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: