Observational analysis compares CMRO2 quantification via qBOLD, breath-hold calibrated fMRI and QSM in glioma, indicating methodological differences influencing results.
Motivation: Several MRI techniques have been proposed for quantification of cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption (CMRO2), each with its own assumptions and limitations. Their relative performance in pathology has not been previously characterised. Goal(s): To compare the performance of three gas-free methodologies for mapping CMRO2 in brains with significantly altered physiology. Approach: Patients with glioma were scanned with qBOLD, breath-hold calibrated fMRI (bhc-fMRI), and QSM mapping of macrovascular oxygenation. Results: CMRO2 estimates from QSM and bhc-fMRI were in good agreement across GM, WM, oedema and enhancing tumour. CMRO2 estimates from qBOLD were elevated in enhancing tumour and had increased variability. Impact: Common implementations for gas-free CMRO2 quantification do not account for non-blood susceptibility sources. This is demonstrated to be problematic for an R2' based qBOLD implementation in primary brain tumour, where haemorrhage and iron deposition can occur concurrently with metabolic changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zappalá et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: