Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis of 1131 subjects with passive implants scanned at 7T, highlighting safety protocols.
Motivation: Many sites use the GUFI recommendation for the inclusion of subjects with passive implants but it remains unclear how many subjects/implants have been scanned. Goal(s): To report on our experience in clearing subjects with passive implants for research scans. Approach: Screening forms were analyzed to identify all subjects with implants and/or tattoos cleared for imaging at our site. Results: Over the past 18 years, 1131 out of 3567 volunteers had implants and/or tattoos and underwent a 7T MR examination. No findings regarding safety occurred, and all examinations could be safely performed. Impact: This retrospective study shares an extensive experience in imaging subjects with small implants within the RF coil. For larger implants outside a minimum distance to the RF coil a history of safe use of the GUFI recommendations is also reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kraff et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: