Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Surveys reveal 40% exclusion rates for patients with implants in high-field MRI, indicating safety testing gaps.
Motivation: Patients with implants are frequently denied access to ultra-high field MRI due to insufficient implant safety testing at >3T. So far, exclusion rates and the types of commonly excluded implants have not been fully assessed. Goal(s): This study aims to quantify exclusion rates for high-field MRI across all 7T sites in the UK. Approach: Surveys completed at each UK 7T site evaluated whether 73 standard procedures would be excluded. Results: Findings showed that 19.4% of the general population and 39.5% of a patient population would be excluded at 7T, with specific implants identified to improve future access. Impact: A lack of safety testing at ultra-high field denies access to patients with implants. The exclusion rate was estimated to be 40% for a patient population, highlighting which implants will be most impactful to improve access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evans et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: